Art History 2.0. A humanistic discipline in the age of virtuality Open Access is one of the most challenging trends in contemporary sciences and humanities. Happily the Getty with its online publication and coordination project of many early art historical texts is now perhaps the most significant player in the field with regard to. The history of art is a young discipline, which really only became a member of the humanities in this country after World War II, so that, for example, I have come here from a Department of Art in the College of Arts and Sciences at the University of Virginia. The History Of Art As A Humanistic Discipline Pdf Printer. Mental health history including asylum and community care periods and consumer accounts. History of publishing: an account of the selection, preparation, and marketing of printed matter from its origins in ancient times to the present. The activity has. The History Of Art As A Humanistic Discipline Pdf Reader. Competencies are part of every step of the therapy process. From intake, to. Assessment, to building the relationship, to interventions, to assessment, to. Kerri chandler kaoz theory rar files. The need for multicultural competencies is present from the first. Erwin Panofsky (March 30, 1892 in Hannover – March 14, 1968 in Princeton, New Jersey) was a German-Jewish art historian, whose academic career was pursued mostly in the U.S. After the rise of the Nazi regime.

The History Of Art As A Humanistic Discipline Pdf Viewer

The History Of Art As A Humanistic Discipline Pdf Viewer

Apple, M.W. 1990. Ideology and Curriculum. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Aristotle. 1980. The Nichomachean Ethics. Trans. D. Ross. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Arnold, M. 1960. Culture and Anarchy, ed., J.D. Wilson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Aronowitz, S. and Giroux, H. 1985. Education under Siege: The Conservative, Liberal and Radical Debate over Schooling. New York: Bergin and Garvey.Google Scholar
Bailey, C. 1984. Beyond the Present and the Particular: A Theory of Liberal Education. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Buber, M. 1971. The Education of Character. In: J.P. Strain, ed., Modern Philosophies of Education. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. 1964. My Pedagogical Creed. In: G. Johnston, ed., Issues in Education. Boston MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
———. 1966. Democracy and Education. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Freire, P. and Giroux, H. 1989. Preface. In: H. Giroux and R. Simon, ed., Popular Culture Schooling and Everyday Life. New York: Bergin and Garvey.Google Scholar
Gadamer, H.G. 1975. Truth and Method. Trans. G. Barden and J. Cumming. New York: Crossroad.Google Scholar
Giroux, H. 1989. Educational Reform and Teacher Empowerment. In: H. Holtz et al., eds., Education and the American Dream. New York: Bergin and Garvey.Google Scholar
Gregory, M.W. 1983. A Radical Criticism of the Platonic Foundation of Liberal education. Liberal Education 69(1).Google Scholar
H. Holtz et al., eds., Education and the American Dream. New York: Bergin and Garvy.Google Scholar
Hook, S. 1973. The Snare of Definition. In: P. Kurtz, ed., The Humanist Alternative. New York: Pemberton.Google Scholar
Hutchins, R. M. 1945. Great Books: The Foundation of a Liberal Education. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Jaeger, W. 1973. Paideia: The Ideals of Greek Culture. Trans. G. Highet. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kirk, R. 1988. The Ethical Purpose of Literary Studies. In: J. Baldacchino, ed., Educating for Virtue. Washington, DC: National Humanities Institute.Google Scholar
Livingstone, R. Character and its Training. In: On Education. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Maritain, J. 1954. True Humanism. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.Google Scholar
Maslow, A.H. 1970. Motivation and Personality. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
———. 1972. The Farther Reaches of Human Nature. New York: Viking Press.Google Scholar
Montaigne, M. 1964. On the Art of Conversing. In: The Essays of Montaigne. Trans. E.J. Trechmann. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Neill, A.S. 1960. Summer hill.New York: Hart Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, F. 1965. Schopenhauer as Educator. Trans. J. W Hillesheim and M. R. Simon. Chicago: Regency-Gateway.Google Scholar
———. 1968. The Portable Nietzsche. Trans. W. Kaufmann. New York: Viking Press.Google Scholar
———. 1968. Thus spoke Zarathustra. In: The Portable Nietzsche. Trans. W. Kaufmann. New York: Viking Press.Google Scholar
Ortega y Gasset, J. 1957. The Revolt of the Masses. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Panofsky, E. 1940. The History of Art as a Humanistic Discipline. In: T. M. Greene, ed., The Meaning of the Humanities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Patterson, C.H. 1973. Humanistic Education. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Perry, R.B. 1940. A Definition of the Humanities. In: T. M. Greene, ed., The Meaning of the Humanities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rogers, C. 1961. On Becoming a Person. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Rorty, R. 1979. Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rousseau, J.-J. 1979. Emile or on Education. Trans. A. Bloom. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Sartre, J.P. 1979. The Humanism of Existentialism. In: W. Baskin, ed., Essays in Existentialism. Secaucus: Citadel Press.Google Scholar
Shaw, G.B. 1951. Man and Superman. Harmondsworth, Middlesex, UK: Penguin.Google Scholar
Solomon, R.C. 1988. Continental Philosophy Since 1750: The Rise and Fall of the Self. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Strain, J.P. 1971. Modern Philosophies of Education. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. 1989. Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Whitehead, A.N. 1957. The Aims of Education and Other Essays. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar